TEACHER INTERVIEW
St. Johns
May 28, 1992
Q. Influenced by the head master?
A. I think two things. My first interview with the head master
here probably influenced me a great deal because we instantly
liked each other and he talked a lot about student expectives,
that we don't expect enough from our students and that's why
students aren't learning very much in most of our classrooms
and I completely agree with that so I'd say he set a standard,
that set a tone in what I was going to teach and the way I was
going to teach and what I was going to expect from students
and I actually think that influenced what I do in the
classroom quite a bit and it continues to do that because he
is an inspiring person and talks about this kind of thing a
lot. We share a mutual distaste for teacher union for the
kind of apathy that is allowed to continue in classroom across
the board in public schools and really share a love, a passion
for reading, for books, for literature, for ideas, for getting
kids to think and so I think those ideals actually that we
both agree on probably influence what I do in the classroom a
lot. And then the second thing was that before I got this job
they had me teach a class of 8th graders and they told me they
wanted me to teach poetry and so I was not given any kind of
guidance whatsoever. I had to just prepare a lesson on poetry
and come in and teach it and I had two English teachers
observe me who are published poets and it was, you know I
prepared what I thought was a good sort of introduction to
poetry but it was clear when I was done that I'd under
estimated the ability of the kids in the classroom and the
amount of poetry that they'd actually done and when Don called
me into his office, this was before I knew whether they were
going to hire me or not, he asked me what I would do
differently if I could do it again, and that's what I told him
I would differently. He said that's all he wanted to hear and
again I think it relates to the first story. I think my
expectations, Don has always expected me to have very high
expectations of my kids, my students, and not to under
estimate junior high abilities and I think that has definitely
influenced the specific kind of literature that I teach and
the themes that I deal with in junior high and I think that's
about it.
Q. Influenced by the Dean of Faculty?
A. O.k. Well, I guess the Dean of the Faculty pulled together a
committee this year of people who were interested in
developing an interdisciplinary program in any area of the
school and opened it up to all faculty members that were
interested in doing that and what came out of that meeting was
the idea that the place to begin is in the junior high. That
we have a lot of freedom in developing curriculum and that we
were going to explore the possibility of first integrating
history and English in the junior high and what came out of
that was the plan that we were going to have a three year
world history program that would begin in 7th grade and end at
the end of 9th grade that would be coordinated with what we do
in English and so a big project, a major project has come out
of that. Something that I think we're going to do that I
don't think anybody else has ever done before and that is to
develop a world history program, three year world history
program that begins in 7th grade that will include art and
music and will pull literature from the period as well as
study themes that I've been able to develop. I mean its a
huge creative project and the possibilities of what are going
to come out of this I think are really very exciting. It
provides, we are going to begin, I mean we've already begun
working on it but Greg Berger and I, who is the person from
the history department who's going to work on it, they've
found money for us to develop it this summer, to develop the
program, the whole junior high faculty are going to
participate in this once we get it fleshed out, so I'd say
that is something pretty concrete that came out of just
basically an idea a few people batting around an idea then
getting together a committee that was going to talk about how
we could actually, did we want to do something that would be
more interdisciplinary on a grand scale? What could we do,
where could we begin, what's the most likely way that we could
be successful, and then to come up with this concrete plan
that's actually going to go into effect this Fall.
Q. Influenced by Board of Trustees?
A. Yah. Andy Rush, who is a well known artist who's on our Board
of Trustees, was head of the education committee, he put
together a community-wide group last year to study education
in Tucson and to come up with some recommendations for
improvement and he's an incredibly creative person. I got to
be on the committee. We pooled our resources and pulled in
leaders from every aspect of the community, from the
university, from the medical center, from IBM, you know from
the world of psychiatry in town, from public school teachers,
from kindergarten all the way through junior college and the
university level, we pulled in physicians, it was absolutely
a wonderful group of people and we met monthly and we defined
the issues our selves; we set our own agenda. I felt like we
made, the discussions were always lively and interesting. You
don't come up with anything that's going to change the world
at the end of something like this, but what, the way it
effected my daily life was continually brought up big issues.
What's the best way that you get students to learn in your
classroom? How can you be more creative? How can you deal
with multiple ways of handling a variety of intelligences? To
keep those questions just right at the forefront so that I am
always figuring out what can I do to do my job better, to get
kids to be more successful, to really get them to learn what
I want them to learn. I'd say that was a daily event.
Q. Influenced by state or federal programs?
A. No. Absolutely nothing. I don't think they have any effect
on what we do at all.
Q. Influenced by North Central?
A. Well, I think the evaluation that we had to do, the self-
evaluation that we had to do to prepare for their visit, all
of the questions we had to answer for them, we actually took
those real seriously in every department. We spent several
days and a lot of hours working on those things and I think we
came up with definitions that were important about what we're
doing and the way we're doing this. I think it actually built
a lot of confidence that we're doing things correctly. There
were some, I am trying to think if there was anything that
came out of that that would have changed the direction of what
we do. I don't think so. You know, I think a lot of that
dealt with jargon, educational jargon that, you know, I don't
have a lot of respect for. The things that were concrete,
that asked us how do you access what you are doing, you know,
what's the scope of what you're doing? I think those things
were valuable for us just in terms of sitting down and
figuring out if we are really doing what a college prep
English department should be doing and I think we came out
feeling that indeed we are and it was worthwhile in the sense
that we had some objective standard and somebody from the
outside coming in and taking a look at what we're doing and
seeing if they agree that we're doing what we think we're
doing. I don't think it changed what I do in the classroom to
any extent except that there's a significant amount of pride
that comes from being labeled a college prep school and I
think the kids actually feel that. They're real proud of the
fact that our standards are higher than the average high
school and junior high and that they really believe they are
prepared for college when they graduate from this school. I
think that's about it.
Q. Influenced by legal or judicial judgement?
A. I don't think so. I think that people here are very aware of,
you know, the kinds of things that people have to be aware of
this year with the whole Anita Hill/Clarence Thomas thing,
being put on notice that sexual harassment is a serious issue,
that people need to just be cautious and not do anything that
could put you in a position where you could be accused of
that. I think because people here are sensitive basically to,
I feel like we're a pretty humanistic group of faculty members
and widely read and, I think we're aware of judicial decisions
that may have, I mean, desegregation cases don't really affect
us but we definitely want to be a racially diverse school, so
you know, I think those. We haven't been mandated to do
anything. I think that we are just aware of the things that
are out there that are important that you need to be careful
of, but I can't think of way that those things are affecting
what I do in the classroom.
Q. Influenced by parents?
A. Well, I think my work place is shaped to a great deal by
parents because the kind of parent that we have here is really
supportive of their child's education and they value
excellence, they value homework, they support us in all those
things. I mean, I don't get people give me, parents give me
a lot of support in terms of the literature that I choose, in
terms of what I'm doing in motivating their kids to read, I
don't ever get a complaint about too much work. I think that
no parents influence us because they're sending us students,
for the most part, who really want to learn and have come from
homes where education is really valued, where the parents are,
you know, they really are a great back-up for us and I, they
don't interfere. I mean, I'd have to say if we are talking
about autonomy, I feel like parents leave me along. They have
a lot of faith and trust in what I'm doing and I can't think
of anytime when I've had a parent ask me not to do something
or to question what I'm doing in the classroom so that I would
change what I'm doing. I taught the Holocaust to 7th graders
this year, I didn't pull any punches, I showed them all of the
footage you'd expect high school students to view and I didn't
get any complaints about it. I told the parents basically I
trusted these kids' judgement and respected their intellect to
think that they were going to handle it and there was no
problem with it. I deal with pretty controversial things. I
oppose censorship, I dole out young adult books that deal with
hot topics and I've never had a parent here object to any of
those kinds of things. I think it has a lot to do with just
the education level of the parents that I'm dealing with.
Q. Influenced by professional organization?
A. Well, actually the National Council of English Teachers is
important to me and I'm a member of the American Library
Association and I do a lot of reading. I read __________
professional journals every month and I get ideas from those
journals. I order the best books that they publish every year
and read them and I get, you know, I keep up on what the
latest is in teaching writing and National Council of English
teachers is definitely very valuable, I think, in helping
English teachers keep abreast of the latest research and just
giving you creative ideas, things that have worked in other
classrooms and they do deal with junior high level. They deal
with different genres, they have great book reviews and I'd
say actually, you know, the book review sources that I read
book lists, and things like that are really helpful for that
also, just to keep me up with the latest in with new and young
adult fiction. Let's see if there's anything else.
Organization. Definitely not. I think that's it.
Q. Influenced by students?
A. I feel like everyday my work life is shaped by students. I
think that I'm, you know, introspective about what happens in
my classroom everyday and so I, you know, I watch very
carefully to see if I'm successful. What, you know, if the
kids are engaged, if they're really learning what they're what
they're supposed to be learning, if they're loving what
they're doing in my classroom and if there's boredom I'd feel
like I need to change what I'm doing immediately. I change
things on a weekly basis. I mean, I only plan a week at a
time so that I can adjust to what has just happened that week.
I mean where I'm going for the whole year but I'm able to make
a lot of changes as I go. Let's see, I give the kids some
kind of survey at the end of the year that asks questions
about what we've read, what things they've enjoyed doing, what
they would do differently if they could do differently, what
advice they'd give to me as a teacher if they could, and this
is all done anonymously and that's actually, you know, really
wonderful. I mean it ends up, I changed a book that I'm not
going to read next year because they're responses this year,
there was one book that seemed that more kids didn't like than
liked so I'm not going to teach it next year. There is such
a wide variety out there that I have to choose from that I'm
not going to choose something that they all don't love
actually. Let's see, I think students change, they affect
what I do all the time because I want them to love English. I
want it to be their favorite subject and I am always watching
for clues about whether or not they're enjoying the writing
that they're doing and the reading that they're doing and they
have to, they speak, every student speaks every day in class
in every discussion that I have, they stand up in front of the
class at least once a week and read something they've written,
their writing twice a week for me, so I think I have a lot of
means of figuring out whether or not they're learning and
enjoying it.
Q. Creative attempt to improve methods etc. that was thwarted?
A. No. Absolutely not. Every creative thing that I've ever
attempted has been encouraged at this school and people love
my ideas and I've tried
some pretty, you know, some things
that I'm taking some risks doing. You know, I read Theodore
Sizer's book this year as soon as it came out and did his, the
project that he describes on emotion with 7th graders where we
just dropped everything and for two weeks they each picked an
emotion, they first came up with a personal definition about
this emotion and based on music that would describe this
emotion they wrote a story about the emotion; they did a piece
of work that would portray the emotion. They wrote poetry
about it. They ended up with an exhibit like a science
exhibit. We had a science, or that kind of a fair where these
things were set up and their work was displayed and that, you
know, that is not, that is completely out of the realm of what
I'm supposed to be doing with my curriculum, but everybody
found real value in me doing it and let me have the freedom to
try it and it ended up being one of the things the kids liked
the most that we did this year, and every single thing, we bat
ideas around all the time and if somebody thinks it might not
work or that you might do something differently, you know, the
head of my department will always discuss that kind of a thing
with me, but she's liked my ideas that I've had up to this
point, so I'd say that we're really encouraged to be creative
and that there's nobody out there who is trying to thwart
that. No force that I can think of. Parents don't do it, the
Board of Trustees don't do it, the Dean of Faculty, head
master, they all really encourage that.
Q. Is there a concern about test scores in English for high
school students?
A. I think there's always going to be concern about SAT scores
because our kids are applying to the best colleges in the
country and so, if we can improve test scores, that's always
something that I think we should be looking at actually. I
mean I don't think we should
Q. Well, I was wondering if that would influence curriculum
decisions like the program you described was put in at 7th
grade was a concern, probably isn't as great as high school.
A. Right. I think we can do more of those kinds of things in a
junior high then we can at a high school. I think that
actually there still is room for a lot of creativity in
English in the high school and they've done that because they
do it with electives that they offer, they can't, in terms of
choice, I mean you want to teach students how to read
critically, how to write in high school and you know, we don't
do that much to prepare kids for the verbal part of the SAT.
We do something and actually I think we need to be evaluating
whether or not we're doing enough. I think we could be
probably having either, you know we have these L block classes
that we offer at lunch which are sort of elective and I think
we could have one, just as an extra thing for kids that want
to prepare for the SAT that would want to do more intense work
with vocabulary. I don't think test scores, I think we're
really trying to teach kids how to think and I don't think we
teach for the SAT at all. I think we'd like to see ourselves
do a better job of preparing kids for that test. We don't do
that much right now to prepare them for it and I think that
test scores are important and so I think it is something we
should look at. I mean, how can we
Q. Preparing for the test is separate from what you teach in the
curriculum?
A. In terms of strategies, the kinds of things that the print in
review teaches you how to, you know, when you see a big
passage that you have to read. First looking at the question,
knowing what you're looking for, we don't spend much time on
that kind of things, sort of simple and I think if we could do
it economically, not have to spend much time on it but spend
a little bit more time getting the kids some of those skills,
I think it would be
Q. I was wondering how freedom with deciding curriculum content,
how much freedom there could be when there is some
expectations that these students get into a particular
colleges.
A. Well, you know, I think the way you're creative in English in
high school has to do with the writing assignments and the
discussion that you have in classes because we really try to
teach using the Socratic method, I mean the literature that we
use in the freshmen year was absolutely, I was driven by the
literature that we had to get through because it's so intense.
They first read Egyptian myths, and they read creation, they
read Old Testament stories, then they read Edith Hamilton's
Mythology then the Odyssey then Julius Caesar, Once a Future
King (?), Red Sky at Morning, Mice and Men and then Inherit
the Wind. That's a very intensive literature course get
through freshman year, so there was absolutely no room for
anything else I did. In junior high I do quite a bit of group
work and those kinds of fun projects but I still think we're
pretty creative in the high school. You can be within those
limitations because of the ideas that you're talking about and
the kind of writing that we do and journal writing and getting
the kids up in front of the class to present things in a
variety of ways that they follow that. So I think in some
respects it is more structured and each of the teachers has
their own style, their own way of getting through that
material, but the kids have to know it, you know so I think
working within, we have freedom within certain limitations.
But I don't, I think what we are doing what we're supposed to
be doing at the college of prep schools in English. I mean I
wish we could have them for two periods. I wish there could
be a whole other period because the other thing is grammar
usage, you know, vocabulary. I mean there is so much that you
have to get through in the course of the year. And we're
really literature intensive and I mean, they not only read
those books in class but they'll also have books that they're
reading outside of class and they have to find time for
_________________________ and there's lots and lots of writing
that goes on. There's not the same kind of opportunity to be
creative in the high school as there is in the junior high.
Q. Failed attempt to influence you?
A. I really haven't found anybody trying to influence me in
anything that I've done so I
Q. Anything that you have resisted?
A. I resisted teaching Once a Future King because its such a hugh
book and takes so much time and I didn't think it was an
important enough book to devote as much time as we do in the
freshman year to it and we had a lot of good discussion about
it and actually I ended up feeling great about what we'd
accomplished over the course of teaching the book but on the
other hand, the head of the English department has considered
not teaching it next year also because of the results of the
dialogue that we had about this book and vocabulary program,
we've debated whether or not our vocabulary program is very
good in the 9th grade. I don't think its very good and I'm
making changes in the junior high program all the time to try
to figure out exactly what the best way is to teach vocabulary
to kids. So that is sort of a mini debate that goes on and
there was one other thing that I thought of. Oh, in the
freshman year I was also supposed to teach Ethan _________ at
the end of the year and I just, they wanted me to teach it and
I didn't teach it and my reasons for teaching it was that I
wanted more time for writing the last two weeks of school and
basically, you know, we disagreed, I disagreed with the head
of the English department on this and he allowed me to do what
I wanted to do. I mean I, I, you know, there's a lot of
support, there's a lot of mutual respect among the people in
this department. We do disagree, we don't agree on everything
but I'd say in the end pretty much people do what they want to
do. I don't think we make changes when we see we're not
doing, I mean I think there is a lot of thought and evaluation
that goes. We've asked administration if next year we can
have the retreat before school starts to look at the whole
scope and sequence and consider doing some major revision in
what we're doing. I pushed for that a lot. I think we really
should be improving it all the time and people are pretty, I
don't know. I'd say everybody here does want the English
department to be better and so, there may be ____________ to
actually get moving and make some changes but people are
pushing for that around here all the time and so it seems you
either have to have that kind of attitude or you might as well
not be here.
Q. What does it mean -- bureaucratic constraints?
A. Well, you know, I'd never make it in the public system that I
know in Tucson. __________________ which I know really
thoroughly because there a lot of bureaucratic constraints on
teachers I think, and it would have to do with curriculum, it
has to do with the kinds of things you can do with kids, the
kinds of freedom that you have in taking kids somewhere to do
something and the kinds of issues that you can deal with and
the kinds of changes that you can make, in the support that
you're going to get from administration when it comes to
dealing with somebody who doesn't want to do work, discipline
back-up, back-up in what you decide to do as far as discipline
goes. People, administration here really believe in the
teachers and they have a lot of respect in the way we handle
things that come up and I'm not, and I think because we're
pretty hard on ourselves, you know, if I blow it, if I make a
mistake I'm pretty quick to correct it myself. You know, I
just don't see it, a lot of those situations as being very
healthy. I don't see bad people being weeded out. I see, you
know, people who aren't good at doing their job, who aren't
working very hard, who in both administration and faculty who
just exist in this system is dead wood and you can't, you
known here, if I want to work with the history department, if
we decide that this is something we are going to do, everybody
is going to have to pull their weight. They're going to have
to work hard; they're going to have to contribute. I don't
have to worry about somebody not doing that and you know,
everything, there's no, there's integrity from the top down.
I would have a real hard time working with somebody where I
had to play a political game. Where I didn't trust that the
person at the top really was himself an intellectual and
sincerely wanted our students, believed in our students but
wanted them to be thinking, growing human beings. You know we
never really got to the heart, I don't think, of the kind of
autonomy that I have which is absolutely pretty amazing. I
mean I --
Q. What would you attribute that to?
A. I get to design the whole course of the year of what I'm going
to do in my classroom myself. I mean people know I've got a
body of knowledge that I'm an expert at and that I'm always
learning myself and that I, you know, I know how to manage a
classroom, I know how to, let me see what else do you have to
do to be a really good teacher? I have passion for what I do
and I have rapport with my students. I like them and I think
that has to be pretty core to what you are before they'll hire
you here. So once they've made this commitment to you and
hire you, they really believe that you're going to know how to
teach your subject area and there is no interference and, you
know, something that XXX did last year and actually I forgot
about this, but he looked at all our final exams and then came
to us at our final faculty meeting and said "I really was not
100% happy with what you did on your final exams. I don't
want to see a lot of multiple choice questions, true or false
questions on your finals. I want the students to be thinking
critically, to be putting together what they've learned,
synthesizing what they've learned this year and demonstrating
the higher critical skills that you've supposedly are passing
on to your students." Well, that did it. He did it in such
a wonderful manner he passed it on with ___________________
_______________________ book which was full of essays on how
to do this, and I think, you know, I grabbed it, I ate it up.
It changed the way I constructed my exams this year, but that
kind of advice always comes in a context of somebody who
absolutely you know he believes what he's saying, he has the
best interest of all of us at heart and believes that we'll do
it, that we're very capable and he demonstrates that he
respects in our discipline and Howard does the same thing and
Peggy Nickerson, the head of the junior high certainly does
the same thing. They're honest with us, if they, you know if
any of us fall on our faces, they talk about it but it's done
in such a kind way and coming from people that you respect
that its not a problem to listen to that and to change and you
want to be better and
Q. In the example that you gave me about encouraging teachers not
to use multiple choice, have there been teachers who have
resisted, accepting that recommendation or making changes to
that?
A. I don't think so because we all, you know I think a few
teachers, there's always, you know this faculty is not a young
faculty. There's always debate about everything and so the
science department, for instance said, there is a certain
amount of objective information that we have to make sure that
the students know it and in history there is going to be a
small amount of that kind of information on stuff, and it was
agreed that "yes, you're not going to completely eliminate
those kinds of questions, but that's not going to be the focus
and so I think for the most part, I don't think, no I don't
think there was resistance. I think that people said, you
know, I think he's right. I think we better take a look at
the way we construct our exams and make sure that they are the
best exams you can construct.