MASSACHUSETTS
Lori Shyavitz & Lester Eggleston Jr.
Background Information
The 1993 Education Reform Act signed into law by
Governor William Weld-R, provided sweeping changes to the
Massachusetts educational system. For example, tenure has
been eliminated, teachers need to be recertified every few
years, and the formation of charter schools has been
approved. The act was proposed by the Joint Committee on
Educational Arts & Humanities as a result of public demand to
do something about the decay of public schools. Steve Wilson
was appointed by Governor Weld to help draft the charter
schools legislation. (National Public Radio, Oct. 25, 1993,
Transcript #1281-9). Since it's inception there have been
sixty-seven proposals for charter school submitted for
approval. Seventeen are scheduled to open in September of
1995. (Palumbo, Mar. 15, 1994, p. 39).
Funding:
Senate President William Bulger is calling for the state
to allocate funds to prevent the impoverishment of the
remaining schools in the public school district. The
prevailing view is that since charter schools are under state
control, the state should be responsible for their funding.
Four options have been presented by legislators. Three of
them call for the direct state funding of charter schools.
The fourth uses the school choice funding formula. This plan
reimburses communities who lose students to other districts
seventy-five percent of the money lost in the first year,
fifty percent in the second year, and twenty-five percent in
the third year (Athans, Mar. 8, 1995, p. 23). As the members
of the Massachusetts legislative committee proposed shifting
the responsibility of funding charter schools to the state,
House Ways and Means Chairman, Thomas Finneran stated that
"no additional funds were available to charter schools"
(Wong, Mar. 29, 1995).
Recently, the House Ways and Means Committee
recommended that $8 million dollars should be allocated to
the communities containing charter schools to help defray
their costs for the upcoming year. This would help allay the
fears that charter schools would take money out of the public
school system. Groups opposed to charter schools, such as
the Massachusetts Teachers Association, have also reacted
positively to the committee's proposal. President Robert
Murphy stated, "Clearly it is good in the sense it should
reduce the harm to public schools. . . It appears [the
funding] is separate from the education reform money" (Wong,
May 9, 1995, pp. 1, 26). Public school programs, such as new
kindergarten classes, are still in danger of being cut due to
the lack of complete funding for charter schools at the state
level. Local districts must fund charter schools.
The praise given to the House Ways and Means Committee's
proposal to assist in providing funds to charter schools by
their opponents (such as teachers unions) may be short-lived.
One day after the House publicized its plan, the Senate Ways
and Means Committee recommended that money originally
designated for statewide educational reform should be used to
support charter schools. The Massachusetts teachers unions
(who are opposed to this concept) have argued that "the
[funds created in the 1993 Education Reform Act] were chiefly
designed to boost public education statewide" (Wong, May 10,
1995, p. 34) and that the loss of this money would result in
cutbacks in existing programs.
The gap between the quality of a traditional public
school education and a charter school education may expand
tremendously in impoverished communities. In Boston, for
example, the per pupil expenditure is normally $5851.
Students enrolled in charter schools will receive $7013.
Therefore, these students may be able to receive more
educational benefits. "The losers will be students whose
'regular' schools have no libraries, guidance counselors or
algebra courses" (The Boston Globe, March 16, 1995, p. 35).
Innovation:
Proponents of charter schools view them as entities that
encourage innovation in a public school system that does not
allow for "big, substantive changes" (Aucoin and Wong, Mar.
26, 1995, p. 1). Charter schools are "laboratories of
change" which may implement more challenging curricula,
smaller class size (and, therefore, individualize
instruction), longer school days, greater parental
involvement, and integrative learning (Aucoin and Wong, Mar.
26, 1995, p. 1). For example, families with elementary
school-aged students enrolled in the Boston Renaissance
Charter School will be given a home computer. Charter
schools can "encourage experimentation, strengthen
accountability and weaken bureaucratic abuses and gridlock
associated with top heavy administrations and teacher unions"
( Providence Journal-Bulletin, April 18, 1995, p. 8A). Such
reform has been minimal in the current system due to the
volume and the extent that regulations rule public education
in Massachusetts.
State Education Secretary, Piedad Robertson, claims
charter schools will "energize public schools" (Aucoin and
Wong, Mar. 26, 1995, p. 30). Due to the success of students
(such as higher test scores) which is assumed to occur after
the implementation of their innovative programs, charter
schools will become the model for improvement throughout
public schools.
Segregation Effect:
Opponents to charter schools fear that their
introduction will benefit the most motivated students and
parents and students in the upper tracks. The "hard to
educate" children will be left behind. However, schools have
been formed to educate Òat riskÓ kids such as high school
dropouts or potential dropouts (the Lowell Middlesex Academy
Charter School), and for homeless youths and wards of the
state (Boston University Charter School at Fort Devens).
Similarly, opponents claim that wealthy students will be
the group that is best served from their creation. However,
students from affluent families are not able to circumvent
the enrollment system in that according to Massachusetts's
charter school law, lotteries must be held if the number of
applicants exceeds the number of slots for a school (Taylor,
Mar. 26, 1995, Northwest Weekly p. 1). This is seen in the
Community Day Charter School in Lawrence, where the students
in grades K-6 were chosen through a lottery with those
children living in the charter school's community getting
priority.
Also, ethnocentrism may become a problem for charter
schools. For example, the Academy of the Pacific Rim, which
was supported by Boston's Asian community, will focus on
Asian languages and culture. In a city with a history of
fragile inter-ethnic relations, this may create further rifts
between the members of Boston's Asian population and other
ethnicities.
Ignoring Reform in the Public School:
Opponents to charter schools warn that they are not the
cure-all to American public education. The President of the
American Federation of Teachers, Albert Shanker stated in a
gathering at Harvard University's Graduate School of
Education "more energy is going into creating those
alternatives than into making fundamental improvements in
existing public schools where a majority of school children
are - and will be - enrolled" (Hart, Apr. 2, 1995, p. A33).
Currently, the charter schools can only serve less than one
percent of the state's school population (Gannett News
Service, Apr. 4, 1995).
Supporters:
Governor William Weld-R.
Steve Wilson - Special Assistant to Governor Weld. He
helped to draft the charter schools legislation.
Martin Kaplan - (Democratic Chair of the Education
Committee)
Robert V. Antonucci - Commissioner of Education
Representative Mark Roosevelt (D - Beacon Hill) - Chief
sponsor in the House of Representatives.
Senator Thomas Birmingham (D - Chelsea) - Chief sponsor
in the Senate. "When viewed in it's totality, I think that
it is simply incontrovertible that this bill represents an
historic and giant step forward for education in this
commonwealth." (National Public Radio, Oct. 25, 1993,
Transcript #1281-9).
Opponents:
Massachusetts League of Women Voters- Doesn't believe
that one person (Secretary of Education), should have sole
power over which charter school applications are accepted.
(National Public Radio, Oct. 25, 1993, Transcript #1281-9).
Massachusetts Municipal Association - Financial
Components- Senate President William Bulger, are calling for
the state to allocate funds to prevent the impoverishment of
the remaining schools in the public school district. The
prevailing view is that since charter schools are under state
control, the state should be responsible for their funding.
Massachusetts Federation of Teachers
Education Association of Worcester
Massachusetts Association of School Committees
Court Case:
One example of the legal battles going on between
opposing sides is the proposed suit to be filed by the law
office of Carl D. Goodman. They are in pursuit of
preliminary and permanent injunctions prohibiting the use of
tax dollars for the funding of charter schools. They propose
that General Legislation chapter 71, section 89 is invalid on
the basis that:
(1) the statute does not provide for the
establishment of public schools, but the establishment of
private schools which are funded by public funds. This is in
violation of the Anti-Aid Amendment to the Massachusetts
Constitution. (Mass Const. amend. art. XVIII;)
(2) The Charter School law does not provide
for public accountability. This is in violation of Part 1,
Art. V of the Massachusetts Constitution; and
(3) that the delegation of authority to
approve charter school applications to the Secretary of
Education was an improper delegation of legislative
authority.
A memorandum is scheduled to be filed within 2-3 weeks of May
17th, 1995.
Click
here to see a copy.
Legislation
The number of charter schools allowed in Massachusetts
is limited to 25. Charters are assigned for a period of five
years and will not go into effect until September, 1995.
Charter school students do not pay tuition. Only three
quarters of one percent of the number of children attending
public schools in Massachusetts can be enrolled in charter
schools. Thus, 2964 is the maximum number of children who
can attend the seventeen charter schools due to open in
September, 1995. Finally, the formation of charter schools
will not influence Proposition 2 1/2.1
These schools may be sponsored by a business or
corporation, at least two certified teachers, or greater than
or equal to ten parents. Although charter schools are viewed
as a means to increase local control in education, school
boards and parent groups are eliminated from the chartering
process in that a charter school application can only be
approved in the MassachusettsÕs Executive Office of
Education. The sponsors submit their application to the State
Secretary of Education (Piedad Robertson) who has the
authority to approve or reject the charters. There is no
appeals process.
Even though charter schools are open to all students (on
the basis of space availability), preference for attendees is
given to students who live in the district in which it is
located. If the number of applicants exceed the number of
available slots, a lottery is held to select the remaining
students. However, Massachusetts does give trustees the
right to set minimum academic standards for student
eligibility in their charters. The students are able to
return to their district's public school at any time during
the school year if they are unhappy with their charter school
education.
The manner in which charter schools are funded depends
upon whether or not they are situated in communities
containing a positive foundation gap or a not positive
foundation gap. If there is a positive foundation gap, the
district in which the student lives is required to pay the
charter school the average cost per student. On the other
hand, if there is no positive foundation gap, the district
pays the lesser of the average cost per student in their
district (if that is the location of the charter school) or
that of the charter school's. In Boston, the average cost
per student was determined by dividing the current school
budget by the number of students enrolled. Funding for
special needs students is the responsibility of the district
in which the student lives.
Although charter schools are public schools, they are
independent of outside control over their integral and daily
operations. Thus, they do not have to comply with most state
regulations (excluding those pertaining to health, safety,
and anti discrimination). In addition, no private or
parochial schools can submit a charter application.
Similarly, locations for charter schools are restricted to
space in an existing public school, a public building, or
space in a privately owned building (such as an office
building or a mall). Thus, finding space to hold a charter
school has been an obstacle of the sponsors.
Teachers hired for charter schools do not maintain their
union ties (if they previously taught in a public school
system). They are only covered as public employees in
matters pertaining to collective bargaining and tort
liability. The teachers have the option of taking up to a
four year leave of absence to teach in a charter school. If
at the end of four years they would like to continue teaching
in the charter school, they are required to resign from their
teaching position in the traditional public school district.
Teachers are not required to be certified, but each charter
must specify their necessary qualifications.
Charter schools are required to provide parents or
guardians of their students as well as prospective families
with an annual progress report. "Students in Charter Schools
are required to meet the same performance standards, testing
and portfolio requirements set by the board of education for
students in other public schools" (Chapter 71, Section 89 of
the 1993 Massachusetts Education Reform Act). This report
cites the schools' budget and solvency, the manner in which
they have been meeting the goals stated in the charter, and
the schools' achievements. If the conditions of the charters
are not fulfilled, the school may be placed on probation and
ultimately shut down. "If they can't deliver, we'll shut
them down." Piedad Robertson (Aucoin and Wong. The Boston
Globe. Mar. 26, 1995, p. 30).
Results of Law:
Piedad Robertson, the Secretary of Education, has
approved twenty-one charter schools. (seventeen of which are
scheduled to open in September, 1995). They are:
1) Boston: Academy of the Pacific Rim Charter School
2) Boston: Boston Renaissance Charter School
3) Boston: City on the Hill Charter School
4) Boston (Dorchester): Neighborhood House Charter
School
5) Boston: YouthBuild Charter School
6) Cambridge: Benjamin Banneker Charter School
7) Lower Cape Cod (Brewster): Cape Lighthouse Charter
School
8) Chelmsford: Chelmsford Charter School
9) Fall River: Fall River Atlantis Charter School
10) Fort Devens (Ayer/Harvard): Boston University
Charter School
11) Fort Devens (Ayer/Harvard): Francis W. Parker
Charter School
12) Franklin: Benjamin Franklin Classical Charter School
13) Hull: South Shore Charter School
14) Lawrence: Community Day Charter School
15) Lawrence: Lawrence Family Development Charter School
16) Lowell: Lowell Middlesex Academy Charter School
17) Marblehead: Marblehead Community Charter School
18) MarthaÕs Vineyard: Martha's Vineyard Charter School
19) Springfield: North Star Academy Charter School
20) Springfield: Sabis International Charter School
21) Williamsburg: Western Massachusetts Hilltown Charter
School
Descriptions of the first schools approved can be found
Here .
Of these schools, five will specifically target "at risk"
children, and five schools will house elementary-age
students.2 Three schools will educate various grade levels,
and two are specifically for middle schoolers.3 Finally, two
Massachusetts schools will base their schools on science and
the Asian culture respectively.4
Conclusions:
Although Massachusetts has passed charter school
legislation giving the schools a great deal of autonomy
(charter schools are considered to be separate corporate and
political entities), questions regarding their funding and
the limits on their creation still remain. In 1998, there
will be a study and evaluation of the established charter
schools by the Department of Education. Depending upon their
review by the general court, the laws governing their
regulation will either become more restrictive or allow for
more independent control. Charter schools are viewed as the
means to decrease state bureaucracy in education. However,
charter school applications can only be approved by the State
Secretary of Education. This seems to be a paradox to the
supporters' attempts to decentralize the government. As the
first 17 schools are not scheduled to open until September,
1995, the effect of charter schools on Massachusetts's
education system has yet to be determined.
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Executive Office of Education
APPROVED 1994 CHARTER SCHOOL APPLICATIONS
Below is a summary of 12 charter school proposals that the
Executive Office of Education has assessed as possessing the
necessary criteria, in accordance with Chapter 71, 89 of the
Education Reform Act of 1993, for becoming fully operational
charter schools.
1. Boston: City on a Hill Charter School
Basic Facts: The proposal for City on a Hill was submitted
by two certified teachers, presently working in the Chelsea
school system. This school intends to enroll 60-100 students,
representing diverse ethnic, racial and socio-economic
backgrounds. The school's grade levels will be 7-12. To date
these two teachers have raised $59,000. A Working Cabinet has
been assembled to raise funds and promote the school's model.
Among those already committed to serving on this cabinet are:
Christopher Lydon; Alden Raine (former Director, MassPort);
Sylvia Schoenbaum (immigration attorney); Tom Hennesey
(Headmaster, Boston High School, and former New England
Patriot); and others.
A National Advisory Board formed to promote the school
include: Michael Dukakis (former Governor of Massachusetts);
Edwin Delattre (former President of St. John's College,
current member of the National Endowment for the Humanities,
and Dean of Boston University's School of Education); and
John Stewart (Education Director of the John F. Kennedy
Library).
School Focus: Civic Education emphasizing commitment to
community service and/or work internships will be a basic
component of every student's program; weekly "Town Meeting"
where students and staff are encouraged to engage in dialogue
concerning school policies and direction.
2. Boston: YouthBuild Charter School
Basic Facts YouthBuild, a non-profit Community Based
Organization located in Roxbury, provides former drop-outs
and disenfranchised youth with academic and vocational
skills. YouthBuild offers a full-time academic program
combined with
a vocational construction component which includes,
renovating abandoned buildings as housing for homeless
families. Students are also exposed to computer technology,
particularly business and construction software, making
YouthBuild's job placement highly successful. In the class of
1993, 80% of YouthBuild graduate qualified for job placement,
and 100% of them were placed in jobs averaging $10/hour. With
a 70% retention rate and on-third of its graduates going on
to higher education, YouthBuild has generated extensive local
and national attention.
Grade Levels YouthBuild's students will not be placed in
traditional grade levels, instead they will be in competency-
based groups. Individual Education Plans track the academic
and vocational progress of each student.
3. Boston: Boston Renaissance Charter School
Basic Facts In a partnership between the Horace Mann
Foundation and the Edison Project, the Boston Renaissance
Charter School intends to implement its ambitious school
design which is the result of 18 months of research and
development grounded in original educational innovations. The
school will be located in Boston's South End, serving a
racially, ethnically, and socio-economically diverse student
population.
Every student will have a computer in his or her home,
allowing content interaction between teachers, students, and
parents. The school will be open for 12 hours per day, with a
7-8 hour academic day, for 210 days of instruction (30 days
longer than the mandated minimum). Among the school's
objectives are: teaching all students a second language;
ensuring computer and technological literacy; encouraging
heavy parental activity and involvement; strengthening
character and values in all students.
The school intends to open in August 1995 with an anticipated
first year enrollment of 700, growing to 1,100 over a period
of 6 years. Beginning with grades K-6, the school will evolve
into a full K-12 operation.
4. Boston: Neighborhood House Charter School
Basic Facts: The applicant, Federated Dorchester Neighborhood
Houses, Inc. (FDNH), intends to establish a K-8 school with
an enrollment of 135 at-risk students (drop-outs, court or
DYS involved students with histories of academic, emotional
and behavioral problems). The FDNH's charter school, The
Neighborhood House Charter School, will operate for 227
school days. The school's teacher/student ratio will be
limited to 1:10. The FDNH has a long and successful track
record in addressing the needs of at-risk students. It
presently operates two well-known middle schools, the Log
School and the Little House, both with sizable waiting lists.
The charter school proposal has generated extensive community
support, such as: Georgette Watson of the Governor's Alliance
Against Drugs; Dr. Barry Zuckerman; Ralph Martin, Suffolk
County District Attorney; Linda Carlisle, DSS Commissioner;
and numerous other community based organizations.
School Focus: One of the basic tenets of the school is the
belief that the neighborhood community and the school are
one. The charter school will integrate school-based services,
by joining together classroom education, social services and
parental involvement. Each family enrolled at the school will
be required to participate in the Family Cooperative,
creating a social infrastructure among families, and offering
GED and ESL classes, as well as other support services. In
addition to an Individual Learning Plan for each student,
families will be asked to commit to a Family Learning Plan.
According to the school's proposal, standards set in the
Basic Skills will meet or exceed the academic standards set
by the Board of Education.
5. Lower Cape Cod (Brewster): Cape Cod Lighthouse Charter
School
Basic Facts: The Lighthouse Charter School's founding
coalition include
parents, community and institutional leaders. Several local
institutions have already agreed to join the school to form
the "educational village", they are: the Cape Cod National
Seashore; Center for Coastal Studies; the Cape Cod Museum of
Natural History; the Academy for Performing Arts; and the
Castle Hill Center for the Arts. The school's governing Board
of Trustees will consist of parents, teachers, students, and
representatives of the above institutions. The school will
serve approximately 100-120 students in grades 6-8, with the
possibility of expanding to include grades 9-12.
School Focus : The Lighthouse Charter School holds as its
central belief that "it takes an entire village to raise a
child" (African proverb). The school will foster an
appreciation for the environment and institutional resources
around which science curriculum and thematic learning will be
based. Mastery of basic skills will serve as the school's
central focus.
6. Fort Devens (Ayer/Harvard): Boston University Charter
School
Basic Facts: Boston University Charter School intends to
establish a residential school, operating 24 hours a day, for
students who are unsupported by a home or family structure,
specifically homeless youth and wards of the state. The
school will draw on the vast human and physical resources
made available as a result of military realignment (e.g.
former military personnel with teaching and training
experience, accountants and engineers, in career transition
due to military contraction will be utilized). The school
will initiate operations with 150 students in grades 7-11 and
will add grade 12 in the second year increasing the student
population to 180 students. The Boston University Charter
School is the outgrowth of a successful summer (1993)
program, First in Peace. Boston University's initiative is
being led by Rear Admiral W. Norman Johnson, USN (ret.), Vice
President and Dean of Students. A career Naval officer, a
native of Roxbury, and a decorated Vietnam combat veteran,
Admiral Johnson played a key role in the racial integration
of the Navy and in developing educational and technical
training and support programs to promote equity and diversity
in the armed forces.
School Focus: The Boston University Charter School will
prepare students to enter higher education or technical
careers upon graduation. A close relationship between BU's
various schools/departments and area businesses will be
developed allowing students to choose a path suitable to
their interests. Community service and volunteerism will be
required for all students. The school will rely both on
traditional academic instruction and vocational/technical
(hands-on) approaches.
7. Fort Devens (Ayer/Harvard): Francis W. Parker Charter
School
Basic Facts: The Francis W. Parker Charter School takes its
name from the New England native schoolmaster and Union Army
colonel who was referred to as the "father of progressive
education" by John Dewey. Initially the Parker School will
enroll 100 students in grades 7-8. It anticipates growing to
350-400 students in 3 to 4 years, expanding one grade level
at a time to cover 7-12. The school will be located near the
intersection of Route 495 and Route 2, thus drawing a diverse
student population from such communities as Lawrence,
Worcester, Gardner, and Concord; all within a 30 minute
commute.
School Focus: The Parker School's philosophy is based on the
nine principles of the Coalition of Essential Schools. A
strong emphasis is placed on such basic or core skills as
reading, writing, and mathematics; rather than attempting to
cover the content of many subjects, the school will instead
focus on depth and mastery in a few essential areas. "Less is
More" describes the Coalition of Essential School's
philosophy of the secondary school curriculum. Total Quality
Management principles will be used. Students and parents will
be asked to enter a compact prior to admission.
8. Franklin: Benjamin Franklin Classical Charter School
Basic Facts: The Benjamin Franklin Classical Charter School
plans to locate in the Town of Franklin, "the fastest growing
town in the Commonwealth." The school's Founding Coalition is
made up of local parents. With a rapidly increasing
elementary and secondary school children in the town, the
charter school will off-set this surge by enrolling 270
students in grades K-8. The school will limit classroom size
to under 20 students at all times.
School Focus: The Benjamin Franklin Classical Charter School
plans to provide its students with a classical education
based on the Core Knowledge Sequence. A strong emphasis is
placed on Basic Skills acquisition. The school's goal for
academic performance is for its students to attain levels at
least 10% higher than those students in the same grades in
traditional public schools.
9. Hull: South Shore Charter School
Basic Facts: The South Shore Charter School will initially
enroll 60 students: 20 in a K-1 class, and 40 in grades 11
and 12. The school's Founding Coalition include teachers,
parents, members of the local business community, public
officials, and representative of higher education. The
founders intend that the school become a Family Learning
Resource Center for the South Shore area. Parental
involvement in the child's learning process is central to the
school's philosophy. In addition, the school volunteers will
be recruited.
School Focus: Significance is placed on interdisciplinary
projects. Students will have the option to take classes at
various colleges and universities (and earn college credit).
Students will be exposed to environmental issues through
participation in the Hull Environment and Service Corps --
the first Youth Community Service and Conservation Corps in
the US that is part of a Public High School.
10. Lawrence: Community Day Charter School
Basic Facts: The Community Day Charter School is a
neighborhood school developed and supported by parents.
Support for this school's proposal include various public
officials, a college president, State Representative Gary
Coon, State Senator John O'Brien, members of the business
community, many other respected community members. The school
plans to enroll 140 students in grades K-6, with a
teacher/student ratio of 1.5 to 20.
School Focus: The school's academic approach is based on
interdisciplinary learning, integrated themes and mixed age
grouping. The bilingual program proposed is a form of
immersion -- non-English speaking students and English
speakers will learn together, with instruction in English.
Parents will also receive ESL and literacy training.
11. Lowell: Lowell Middlesex Academy Charter School
Basic Facts: The Lowell Middlesex Academy Charter School
proposal is the outgrowth an existing school sponsored and
operated by Middlesex Community College (MCC). Established in
1989, Lowell Middlesex Academy has served over 400 students,
all of whom were drawn from the official dropout rolls of
Lowell High School. The Academy Charter School plans to
enroll 100 students in grades 9-12. Maximum class size will
be 20 students. The school will follow the MCC academic
calendar. Classes will be held between 11:00 AM and 8:00 PM.
The school will continue to operate at its current location:
the City Campus of Middlesex Community College, in downtown
Lowell. Students will continue to have access to the
college's facilities, including the library, computer labs,
and cafeteria.
School Focus: The Lowell Middlesex Academy Charter School is
based on the Middle College model developed by New York
City's LaGuardia Community College; it will provide an
academically challenging environment for at-risk youth (ages
16-22). The school intends to implement a new curriculum that
departs from the traditional, lecture- oriented approach.
Instead, interdisciplinary and hands-on activities, community
service and job internships, will be combined in an
integrative fashion. The school will increase its involvement
with the college's 2+2 Program (allowing high school students
who participate in college classes to receive both high
school and college credit).
12. Williamsburg: Western Massachusetts Hilltown Charter
School
Basic Facts: The Western Massachusetts Hilltown Charter
School proposes establishing a regional school with an
enrollment of 35 students (47 by 1999) in grades K-4. The
school intends to offer a rural educational alternative in
the area. The school will be accessible to the seven
hilltowns in Hampshire County: Chesterfield, Curnrnington,
Goshen, Plainfied, Westhampton, Williamsburg, and
Worthington. The Founding Coalitions consists of parents,
teachers, and community members.
School Focus: This charter school seeks to be a "community"
school, using a child- centered educational approach where
children are encouraged to take initiative, make decisions
and follow through on tasks. The school will employ the
Reggio Emilia educational philosophy, based on the premise
that the arts provide the ideal language for young children
to creatively investigate and learn. The applicant cites five
primary issues this school will address: 1) the need for a
child-centered approach to education; 2) the need for a
collaborative approach to education; 3) the importance of a
thematically unified curriculum fully integrating the arts;
4) integrating family involvement in the educational process;
and 5) the need to integrated the school experience into the
rich fabric of the community and rural environment.
For a bibliography of sources on charter schools in
Massachusetts, click Here .